Skip to main content

Podium for November LAS in Switzerland Event

Earlier, I announced the LAS November Event on Lean & Scrum in Switzerland. (Just a reminder: Dagmar Gawenda will present the Pull Principle: Lean Production at Griesser. Mario Magnanelli and Kai Windhausen will present their experience migrating a large financial organization to Lean and Scrum).  Now we have the speakers lined up for the podium discussion.

Francois Bachmann will moderate a Podium Discussion on the realities of migrating to learning, self-improving organizations. Speakers Kai and Dagmar will be joined by
  • Patrick Scheuerer, Head of Services, Amt für Migration Kt. Bern, and
  • Mike Kästner, Chief Information Officer, COMIT AG 
to discuss the highs and lows of their transformations: "Help, we're going Agile!"

Personally, I am looking to see if/how well Griesser's practical experience with the Pull Principle matches up with the theory. If you believe the simulations, applying the Pull Principle should increase production, decrease turn-around time and free up resources. Does this promise hold up in practice? I'm confident, but I'm looking forward to hearing the details!

November 9, 16.30 to 20.30 (including Apéro and Networking). Information and registration are available online at the SwissICT.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Explaining Story Points to Management

During the February Scrum Breakfast in Zurich, the question arised, "How do I explain Story Points to Management?" A good question, and in all honesty, developers can be an even more critical audience than managers.

Traditional estimates attempt to answer the question, "how long will it take to develop X?" I could ask you a similar question, "How long does it take to get the nearest train station?

The answer, measured in time, depends on two things, the distance and the speed. Depending on whether I plan to go by car, by foot, by bicycle or (my personal favorite for short distances) trottinette, the answer can vary dramatically. So it is with software development. The productivity of a developer can vary dramatically, both as a function of innate ability and whether the task at hand plays to his strong points, so the time to produce a piece of software can vary dramatically. But the complexity of the problem doesn't depend on the person solving it, just …