Skip to main content

Swiss Lean Agile Scrum Event: Call for Participation

Mark your calendars: Zurich, June 4. 2009. Under the motto of 'Beyond the Hype, Agile in Practice', the SwissICT Lean Agile Scrum Group is organizing its first agile project management conference in Zürich.

In the morning we plan to hold introductory workshops  'Scrum 101', 'Lean 101' and 'XP 101'. In the afternoon, the conference will have two tracks dedicated to reports from people - managers, project leaders, developers, coaches, etc. - with actual experience will Lean or Agile Software projects. Experience, good or bad, positive or negative, management or technical, success or ... whatever,  with all flavors of Lean and Agile software methodologies are welcome: XP, Scrum, Scrum-ban, Crystal... if it's lean or agile, it's welcome, but we're looking for honest reports on real projects.

The event is basically a full day event. Our target is 100 participants, but how many will come? Well, that depends on how good you talks are ;-)


How to submit a proposal for a talk

Please follow the guidelines from Call for Participation: Talks for the Scrum Breakfast. Each talk is 45 minutes. The preferred language is German, but English is also acceptable. Please submit your proposal in the language you plan to hold the talk. All speakers get free admission to the conference.

If you would like to lead a '101' workshop

Please send us a proposal with course outline. The total duration is 90 minutes (excluding breaks). We do plan a somewhat more than symbolic compensation (but don't expect to earn a living on it ;-) ).

Please send your proposal to beyondhype-submission (at) sierra-charlie (dot) com. Deadline for submission is March 15, 2009.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

10 Warning Signs, that your team is not self-organizing

How do you know that self-organization is working? The Bern Chapter of Scrum Breakfast Club looked into this questions, and identified the following warning signs (which I have taken the liberty of translating).

The team reports to the Scrum Master at the Daily ScrumPeople wait for instructions from the Scrum MasterTeam members don't hold each other responsible [for their commitments]The same impediment comes up twice"That's the way it is" => resignation"I" instead of "We"Flip charts are lonelyCulture of conflict-avoidanceDecisions processes are unclear, nor are they discussedPersonal goals are more important than team goals
To this list I would add my a couple of my favorites:
you don't see a triangle on the task board (not working according prioritization of stories)after the daily Scrum, people return directly to their desks (no collaboration)there are a least as many stories in progress as team members (no pairing)
P.S. You can join the …