Skip to main content

Quick Poll: Scrum Management Tools

Back in January 2007, a poll went out on the scrumdevelopement mailing list, asking its members how they managed their Scrum projects.

Scrum has come a long way since then (there are now some 25'000 CSMs worldwide) and judging by attention in the mainstream press, seems to be picking up steam in Europe as well.

So I thought it would be interesting to revisit the poll taken by the scrumdevelopment group:

Which tool / software do you use to manage your Scrum projects?
  • Paper (Cards, Sticky Notes)
  • Paper with a Webcam
  • Excel or OpenOffice Spreadsheet
  • Google Docs Spreadsheet
  • Jira
  • Microsoft Project (or other "classical" PM software)
  • Mingle
  • Rally Dev
  • Scrum for Team System v2.0
  • ScrumWorks
  • TargetProcess
  • VersionOne
  • Other Propietary
  • AgileTrack
  • XPlanner
  • Other OpenSource
  • Own Tools/Other
  • Don't know/don't care
As usual, I will post the results on the blog.

Comments

Jay Conne said…
Peter, thanks for doing this poll. I marked 'paper', but wish you had more than one choice selectable. I use paper as my default - the simplest, most visceral experience I can give my team - plus it brings all stakeholders to the information radiator where they can have real conversations! I use a spreadsheet for release and project burndown or burnup of stories and points. If I have a distributed team, I use the spreadsheet and auto charting for the Sprint burndown. If a client uses an expensive product, of course I'll use that if they insist. We also have Product Owners use spreadsheets for the product backlog with posting and completion dates as well as points and Spints where it was committed and completed. This provides a nice historical record and for stakeholder/sponsor/governance auditability. We photograph our paper artifacts and post them in an easy to discover directory format - typically by project overall and by Sprint. Could you expand the survey to have more choices? How about tagging as preferred for a purpose - as I described above. and then 2nd and third choices - again for a purpose as it needs context - as I gave here.
Thank you, Jay
Anonymous said…
It seems like your survey should allow multiple tools to be selected. For example, on the project I'm on, we use Paper with a Webcam, Excel, and JIRA. How can I boil that down to a single radio button selection?
Peter said…
Hi folks,

A very legitimate question. I debated long with myself about whether to allow multiple choices, because I figured this would be the case.

I decided to only allow one choice so the results would be comparable with the scrum development poll from January 2007.

The polling software on blogger.com is fairly limited. There is no way to ask more than one question in a single poll or to say "vote for at most three items". Once the poll has started, it is not possible to change it any more, not even to fix typos. So to change the poll, I have to through away the 65 results that have already come in. :-(

So I think I would be best to let this poll run to the end, but then to rerun it next week allowing multiple choices.
Peter said…
Jay,

A question: how do you use the pictures. Does anybody actually refer to them, or are they more for archiving purposes, "just in case"? Are the pictures readable? How much resolution does it take to get a usable picture?

I must admit, I am skeptical, but curious about the approach and am wondering what your experience is.

Cheers,

Peter
Michael Sahota said…
I found the results very surprising and wonder if a vendor made an effort to skew the results. Might be better to create the poll for scrumdev members so that people need to register to vote.
Peter said…
Hmm. Interesting issue. If these results trully reflect actual usage (and if the results of the scrum development poll from 2007 did as well), then a tremendous shift towards purchased automated tools has taken place or the newcomers are less convinced by paper than the early adopters. I know of 1 team which recently adopted agile (or at least they said they did) but continued to use jira to manage their tasks.

Unfortunately, neither poll is a "representative sample" in the statistical sense, so add salt liberally when evaluating the results.

I've been checking the results regularly. The trends were clear after about 20 votes cast and the growth since then seems organic, (at least to my eyes). So I don't think any mobilizing or cheating has taken place -- but I wouldn't want to use this polling mechanism to hold elections either! ;-)

I think the best way to get better results is to have more people vote. As I write this, scrum development has over 5800 subscribers but just 80 people have voted (vs. 125 in 2007).

I think it would be be great if we could get 10 or 15% of the scrum development readers to vote, it would give the poll a different credibility and limit the impact of concerted measures.

Anyone want to to be the beat the drum and get out the vote? A reminder or two on the list should do the job.

Cheers,
Peter

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Five Simple Questions To Determine If You Have the Agile Mindset

My company has started a top-down transition to Scrum and Kanban. Will that make us an Agile company? About 2 years ago, I attended a conference hosted by the Swiss Association for Quality on the topic of Agility. As a warm-up exercise, the participants were given the 4 values of the Agile Manifesto, then asked to arrange themselves in space. How Agile is your company? How Agile do you think it should be? Very Agile on left, very traditional on the right. There was a cluster of people standing well to the right of center. “Why are you standing on the right?” It turns out that they were all from the railway. “Our job is to run the trains on time.” They were uncertain whether this agility thing was really aligned with their purpose.
Is Agility limited to software? Steve Denning has collected the evidence and laid out the case that Agile is not limited to software, nor is it merely a process, nor is it something you can do with part of your time, nor is it something you can have your …