Skip to main content

Why fixed length sprints?

One common question for people new to Scrum is, "why should the length of the sprint be fixed?" What harm does it do to extend a sprint or plan the length of the sprint according to the task at hand?

There are probably as many answers to this question as there are ScrumMasters (25'000 the last time I looked), but two factors stand out:
  1. dealing with complexity
  2. maintaining agility of the team (and by extension of the company).
Under Scrum, we keep complexity under control by defining the parameters of each sprint. Time (calendar), Quality (through the definition of done and possibly other functional requiremens), Cost (team size * time available) and Scope for each sprint. Since Time, Cost and Quality are defined, the only thing which can vary is the amount of functionality actually produced. This is what is inspected at the end of each sprint.

I like to refer to the agreement between prodoct owner and team as the "Sprint Contract". So arbitrarily changing one of the parameters violates the Sprint Contract, and this is clearly not allowed.

Harry Sneed's "devil's square" shows the relation between Scope, Quality, Time and Cost.

And the end of each Sprint, the Product Owner inspects the progress of the team -- defined exclusively through the amount of scope produced -- and has the option of changing the course of the team.

Changing any of the other parameters, say the duration of the sprint, is 1) a violation of the sprinnt contract and 2) hides from the project owner that progress is not being made as planned (or hoped). He is deprived of the chance to make a course correction.

I believe there is a close correlation between corporate agility and fixed length sprints, so the next question should be, how long to sprint...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Devil's square was invented and propagated by Harry M. Sneed in his books on Software Project Calculation.
Peter said…
Thanks, anonymous!

I think Sneed's square is a major improvement over the 'Iron Triangle', which ignores Quality, or at best considers it floating in the air and somehow not related to the other parameters.

Wrong!

Oddly enough, time money invested in quality (in the form of, say, automated unit tests) reduces the cost and increases the performance. But you need a to take a view which is longer than a sprint or two.

Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

10 Warning Signs, that your team is not self-organizing

How do you know that self-organization is working? The Bern Chapter of Scrum Breakfast Club looked into this questions, and identified the following warning signs (which I have taken the liberty of translating).

The team reports to the Scrum Master at the Daily ScrumPeople wait for instructions from the Scrum MasterTeam members don't hold each other responsible [for their commitments]The same impediment comes up twice"That's the way it is" => resignation"I" instead of "We"Flip charts are lonelyCulture of conflict-avoidanceDecisions processes are unclear, nor are they discussedPersonal goals are more important than team goals
To this list I would add my a couple of my favorites:
you don't see a triangle on the task board (not working according prioritization of stories)after the daily Scrum, people return directly to their desks (no collaboration)there are a least as many stories in progress as team members (no pairing)
P.S. You can join the …