Skip to main content

Story Points and the Heart of Scrum

Last week I wrote, "Story Points are not uncontroversial" and lo, and behold, not a week after I made the comment, I posted essentially the same arguments to the Scrum Development mailing list in response to question about how many man days are there in a story point. Dave Rooney of Mayford Technologies wrote back:
"I generally agree with Peter's points..., except that estimating any development effort in hours is a mistake, plain and simple. You are mistaking 'precision' with 'accuracy' in that case, and any estimation is bound to be incorrect.

"What you need to do is to measure the team's *actual* output, and feed that back into the measurements as the velocity. These measurements need to begin as soon as development starts, and need to be made continuously. That's the only way to introduce any accuracy into your estimates."
I think there are two perspectives here.

On the one hand, I'm totally in agreement with Dave that estimating in story points as an abstract unit is the right way to go and with his observation about the importance of measuring the team's actual output.

But on the other hand, Project Management is always about the Art of the Possible. Getting the project to a satisfactory conclusion under the circumstances, particularly if you are rescuing a project in crisis. I have seen a number of attempts to a implement a pure agile approach fail due to lack of flexibility on the part of the Agile champions or due to resistance from the team.

So we have stick to our principles: Continuous Improvement, Self-organization, Commitment Driven. Taking exactly what you can eat. Eliminate Impediments. These Principles define the practices at the Heart of Scrum. The Plan - Do - Review - Improve Sprint Cycle. A fixed length Sprint with a fixed (or at least predefined) team. A negotiated Sprint Contract between Product Owner and Team. A Definition of Done. If you're not doing these things, you're not doing Scrum.

We can comprimise on practices if we are true to our principles and to the heart of Scrum. User Stories are a practice. Story Points are a practice. We can use them or not if they make sense for our project. (They are also very good practices, and where I haven't used them from the beginning, I have migrated to them as the projects moved forward).

Once you start doing Scrum, the Scrum Master can start prodding in the team to adopt the Agile practices that fully unleash their potential. But I've written why a coach is more effective than a bulldozer and how it took the Team exactly one meeting to raise the contradiction of being told what to do while being told they are self-organizing. So compromise and accommodation is part of the game.

Which brings us to the project at hand. But that is tomorrow's post.


Popular posts from this blog

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Explaining Story Points to Management

During the February Scrum Breakfast in Zurich, the question arised, "How do I explain Story Points to Management?" A good question, and in all honesty, developers can be an even more critical audience than managers.

Traditional estimates attempt to answer the question, "how long will it take to develop X?" I could ask you a similar question, "How long does it take to get the nearest train station?

The answer, measured in time, depends on two things, the distance and the speed. Depending on whether I plan to go by car, by foot, by bicycle or (my personal favorite for short distances) trottinette, the answer can vary dramatically. So it is with software development. The productivity of a developer can vary dramatically, both as a function of innate ability and whether the task at hand plays to his strong points, so the time to produce a piece of software can vary dramatically. But the complexity of the problem doesn't depend on the person solving it, just …

Money for Nothing, Changes for Free

“Money for Nothing, Changes for Free” encourages both customers and suppliers to focus on value.

A key advantage of Scrum projects is that at least once per sprint you have something that could be shipped and no work in progress. You can change direction every sprint, and you can reevaluate whether the project is a good investment or if your money could be better spent elsewhere. Abrupt cancellation is risky for the supplier.

While the concept of an early-exit penalty is not new, Jeff Sutherland gave it a unique allure with his allusion to the Dire Straits hit.
Desired Benefit Incentivize both customers and suppliers to focus on functionality that provides genuine value.
Structure This works with Agile software projects because there is little or no work in progress. After each Sprint, functionality is either complete or not started. Work is basically on a Time and Materials basis with a cost target, often with the intention that the project should not use up the entire project budge…