Skip to main content

What is Scrum?

The Scrum trainer and coaches community is working on a revision of Core Scrum. It is a passionate group, and each member feels passionate about Scrum. Not surprisingly, there are (at least) as many different understandings of Scrum as there are members of the community. This discussion inspired me the think about what does Scrum mean for me?

My goal is that each project I work on should be the best project I ever worked on. Each project should achieve great results. Scrum helps me achieve both goals.

What follows is my view of Scrum. It is the vision I try to pass on in my courses and the vision I try to live in my own projects. I hope it is also the start of an interesting conversation!

Introduction - What is Scrum?

Scrum is a simple, team-based framework for solving complex problems. Scrum is a framework for transforming your working environment into a much better place. Scrum is a mindset.

The core of Scrum can be summarized in two words: Inspect and Adapt. The roles, activities, agreements and instruments defined in Scrum exist to enable inspection and adaptation at regular intervals on the basis of correct and honest information.

To adapt means to change for the better. So Scrum is not simply a framework for building great products, it is a framework for transforming your environment into something better. A willingness to change is essential for success with Scrum.

There are many issues that Scrum does not address. Scrum does not tell you how to develop software (or solve any other problem area). Scrum does not say anything about the structure of your organization beyond the Scrum Team. Scrum does not tell you who answers the phone when the customer calls.

What does Scrum help you do?

Scrum does help you recognize issues quickly. Resolving them is your job. How to solve those issues? Those pages are left blank, so you can develop, adapt or evolve great approaches to fit your context. And there are many practices, from Extreme Programming, Lean Thinking and Kanban, to Radical Management, Management 3.0 and Lean Startup, to name but a few, that can help you in your situation.

Through its simple framework, Scrum helps you eliminate the common sources of dysfunction in projects. In particular, excessive multitasking, too much work in progress, and unrealistic expectations can be hugely detrimental to your performance. Scrum enables you to create an environment that values focus, finished work, a sustainable pace and true collaboration.

Scrum is a reference implementation. A reference implementation can be a good place to start, because it is known to work effectively. It’s also a reference for evaluating your own approach and its effectiveness. Is pure Scrum “by the book” the only way to inspect and adapt effectively? Of course not! Is the best way? There is no single best way. But if your approach has you inspecting and adapting less often than Scrum, you are probably less effective than you could be.

So as you practice Scrum, sooner or later your approach will evolve away from Scrum by the book. That's OK, as long as your changes are genuine improvements, that is, they cause you to inspect and adapt more often.


Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Five Simple Questions To Determine If You Have the Agile Mindset

My company has started a top-down transition to Scrum and Kanban. Will that make us an Agile company? About 2 years ago, I attended a conference hosted by the Swiss Association for Quality on the topic of Agility. As a warm-up exercise, the participants were given the 4 values of the Agile Manifesto, then asked to arrange themselves in space. How Agile is your company? How Agile do you think it should be? Very Agile on left, very traditional on the right. There was a cluster of people standing well to the right of center. “Why are you standing on the right?” It turns out that they were all from the railway. “Our job is to run the trains on time.” They were uncertain whether this agility thing was really aligned with their purpose.
Is Agility limited to software? Steve Denning has collected the evidence and laid out the case that Agile is not limited to software, nor is it merely a process, nor is it something you can do with part of your time, nor is it something you can have your …