Skip to main content

Remembering Heaven

A Respectful Approach to Introducing Scrum (or some other framework).

At the Lean Agile Scrum Conference in Zurich, David Anderson explained the basic approach of Kanban:
  1. Start with what you do now
  2. Agree to pursue incremental, evolutionary change
  3. Initially, respect current processes, roles, responsibilities & job titles
The implication of course is that Scrum is disrespectful because Scrum comes with new roles. His comments were echoed by many participants. Given that Respect is a core value of Scrum, I was surprised at this insinuation. Why do so many people seem to find the Scrum approach disrespectful?

Here is how I prefer to introduce Scrum.

When I first read Ken Schwaber's 'Agile Project Management with Scrum', there was a paragraph which really got my attention: 'Remember your best project? How was it?'

In my case, I was working for the SIG in Neuhausen. Urban Wymann, my customer / project leader was responsible for introducing some 60 Sun Workstations into the CAD department. His goal was to install and manage those systems with a reasonable amount of effort. I had some ideas on how to do application distribution, so he gave me a week to try out my idea. After a week, I demoed what I had written; he liked it and gave me feedback about where the next step should go. We continued on that basis -- one week cycles of demo, discuss, do, demo -- through the entire summer. By the end of the summer, the 'Stevens Tools', were able to automatically install, update and configure a network of 60 workstations spread over two sites with minimal effort on the part of the system manager. This work started in 1993 and the Stevens Tools became the basis of my career for the next 10 years.

See any similarities to Scrum? I sure did. When I read that sentence in Ken's book, I was hooked. All of sudden I understood exactly what he was talking about and I knew that Scrum was right for me.

How effective would your efforts be if you colleagues, managers and stakeholders could have a 'Eureka!' moment like that?

Today when I go to a customer for the first time to hold an 'Intro to Scrum' workshop, the first thing I do is ask them -- as a group -- to remember their best projects and share those stories with each other. (I'll skip the details of how I do the moderation - it is basically Seth Kahan's Jumpstart Storytelling). The group eventually selects the best stories (top 3 or so) and listens to them in plenum.

After everyone has heard the best examples of a good project, I show them a list of attributes of successful projects and ask them which ones they see in their stories. Although my list is a pretty good one, their list often has some interesting additions. Those (and the things they missed) are the basis for an interesting discussion on how to best move forward.

Based on their stories they tell, I can usually see if Scrum or Kanban is a good match.  I have even run into cases where neither is a good match - in this case, the people need to invent something new, and that's OK.

By going through this exercise, they focus on what's really important to succeeding. Assuming their patterns are a good match with Scrum (and they usually are), then we can go look and see how Scrum helps them achieve the things they need to be succussful. More importantly, the story telling mode gets them into really thinking about the issues instead of reacting defensively.

So how do I explain the principles of Scrum? Easy:
  1. Remember your best project? Strive to make this project like your best project.
  2. Do something which is pretty good, and improve from there. (Inspect and Adapt)
  3. Timebox (so Inspect and Adapt works quickly)
  4. Trust the team
Oh yes, and replacing a culture of fear with a culture of trust is one of the most important things you can do to improve the productivity and creativity in your organization.

And still, I am left with the question, Why do so many people seem to find the Scrum approach disrespectful?


srinivas C said…
Lovely post. It hits home! I've not been to this site for a while.... my loss.
Peter said…
Dear srinivas C,

Thank you for the flowers!


Popular posts from this blog

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

10 Warning Signs, that your team is not self-organizing

How do you know that self-organization is working? The Bern Chapter of Scrum Breakfast Club looked into this questions, and identified the following warning signs (which I have taken the liberty of translating).

The team reports to the Scrum Master at the Daily ScrumPeople wait for instructions from the Scrum MasterTeam members don't hold each other responsible [for their commitments]The same impediment comes up twice"That's the way it is" => resignation"I" instead of "We"Flip charts are lonelyCulture of conflict-avoidanceDecisions processes are unclear, nor are they discussedPersonal goals are more important than team goals
To this list I would add my a couple of my favorites:
you don't see a triangle on the task board (not working according prioritization of stories)after the daily Scrum, people return directly to their desks (no collaboration)there are a least as many stories in progress as team members (no pairing)
P.S. You can join the …