Skip to main content

Core Agile Values

I have always felt that agile is really about values: Openness, Honesty, Courage, and Trust. Personally Whenever I remained true to these values things went OK. In those (rare) cases when I have given into temptation, danger was lurking.

Thanks to Geek and Poke
This cartoon illustrates a classic case. Three levels of management get three different answers about the state of the project. As the report moves up the management chain, its status changes from Red to Yellow to Green. Sound familiar?

Why does this happen? A project leader colleague of mine was literally afraid of losing his job if he told his managers the truth about his project. So he didn't. Until one day, the truth could not be hidden any longer. Unfortunately, this was three days before a release party (which had to be canceled). Bad thing.

Did the impact of the truth get smaller as time went on? No. Did it become easier to deal with the problem as time went on? No. So why do people hide the truth? I think lack of trust (and the fear it inspires) is the root cause.

In another case, a ScrumMaster I know didn't want to show the release burn down to the product owner or discuss how much the team had worked on the project during the first sprint. The team hadn't met its goals for the sprint (and had spent much more time than planned on support duties from a previous project).

Why didn't she want to show the P-O this information? "He'll flip out when he sees the project is late after just one sprint." I insisted and she made the information available. She was right, though. The P-O did flip out. And when he settled down, he and the relevant managers had a talk about the amount of support work the team was allowed to do, which eliminated the problem.

If someone is afraid of the consequences of being honest, then that person is more likely to tell people what they want to hear. An policy of trust implies that people can tell possibly unpleasant truths without fear of retribution.

A policy of openness means that all stakeholders in a project have a right to complete, correct and up to date information about the state of the project. It means that there is no good news and bad news, just facts, and we want to react to facts as soon as they become known. If you know the facts, you can deal with them.

Some of you may be thinking, "we can't tell the customer about that." If you think openness is a bad thing, consider the alternative. What are the consequences of a lack of openness? What will happen when the information eventually comes out? (Don't worry, it will come out!) Can you have a policy of selective openness? And if yes, how will that impact your customer's trust and how will that impact your business?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Five Simple Questions To Determine If You Have the Agile Mindset

My company has started a top-down transition to Scrum and Kanban. Will that make us an Agile company? About 2 years ago, I attended a conference hosted by the Swiss Association for Quality on the topic of Agility. As a warm-up exercise, the participants were given the 4 values of the Agile Manifesto, then asked to arrange themselves in space. How Agile is your company? How Agile do you think it should be? Very Agile on left, very traditional on the right. There was a cluster of people standing well to the right of center. “Why are you standing on the right?” It turns out that they were all from the railway. “Our job is to run the trains on time.” They were uncertain whether this agility thing was really aligned with their purpose.
Is Agility limited to software? Steve Denning has collected the evidence and laid out the case that Agile is not limited to software, nor is it merely a process, nor is it something you can do with part of your time, nor is it something you can have your …