The actual competitive advantage which can be achieved by consequently deploying the principles and practices of Scrum, Lean and XP have coincided with substantial revenue gains for the companies concerned:
- Excellent Scrum - annual revenue up 400%
- Good Scrum - revenue up 300%
- Pretty Good Scrum - revenue up 150% - 200%
- ScrumButt - revenue up 0-35%
His recommendations to investors:
- Invest only in Agile projects
- Invest only in market leading, industry standard processes – this means Scrum and XP
- Ensure teams implement basic Scrum practices
- Get your teams to pass the Nokia test.
- Get management totally involved.
- Use communication saturation as a competitive advantage.
- What backlog item will drive the earliest appearance of a high priority feature that can be tested?
- Entire team decides this and it is the first thing selected to be worked on.
- Extend the definition of done

2 comments:
Hey,
what else would you propose if you were Jeff? In short: Invest into me, give me all your money because I am the one who knows best how to use it ;-)
Once again I don't like the terms like hyper-productivity.
However he is right in summarizing key factors for productivity: Involvement/commitment and removal of impediments. Small highly committed team, focusing on producing business value.
Regards
Felix
Agreed - Hyper is, well, uh, hype. I'm going to put it in quotes.
I have personally experienced a factor of three productivity spread from a team in a very disorganized state to that same team in very productive state with most impediments removed.
So I do believe his analysis: 30% improvements if you get something close to Scrum, much more is possible if you deeply institutionalize it.
Cheers,
Peter
Post a Comment