Skip to main content

Managing Scrum with Paper and Cards

The beauty of cards is threefold: 1) They are flexible and 2) they are easy to use when working in a group. Used to manage the sprint, 3) they are part of an extremely easy to understand overview of the state of the project.

So whether you are brainstorming on stories, planing tasks for the current sprint, or reviewing the sprint in a retrospective, cards are easy, let people work in parallel, and a very effective for communicating and prioritizing information. Even now, I prefer to use cards for the Sprint Retrospective, despite their drawbacks.

The drawback of cards are also threefold - reusing data, backup and distributed access to the data. So if you use cards to create your product backlog, that's fine. But now your CEO wants a report on which stories have been completed and which are forecast to be completed by which sprint. Easy to do if you have a spreadsheet, but first you have to enter all the data by hand, a job which usually falls on one person. Related to reuse is backup (and possibly other security issues): what happens if you loose the cards? (Anybody remember what a floor sort is?)

What do you do with distributed teams? Everybody needs to see the task board. In a meeting, everybody needs to not just read, but also post cards on the wall. How do you send the sprint contract to your customer? I have heard of teams using web cams and Skype connections to broadcast the task board to remote sites, but even that seems like a weak alternative. The remote sites have read only access to the cards, if they are even legible...

Using cards to manage the Scrum data (backlogs, taskboards, burndown) does not address how to manage other documentation, e.g. design documents, program documentation. What do you do with the rest?

And finally, how well does the approach scale? When you have hundreds or thousands of stories?

Personally, I use (and love) cards for the Sprint Retrospective and for the initial product brainstorming. For your first sprints, this is a good place to start, if not the place to start, but I think most teams will quickly reach the natural limits of this approach.

[ Previous :Paper, Office or Dedicated Tools? ]
[ Next :Managing Scrum with Wiki and Office ]

Comments

Michael Dubakov said…
I think cards has one more benefit. Cards are tangible. People love to use something tangible like paper, post-it notes, markers, etc. It is good feeling of control and nice real feedback.

I like to take backlog's cards stack and look through the stories one by one. For some reason it stimulate imagination and good ideas popping up more often :)

Popular posts from this blog

Sample Definition of Done

Why does Scrum have a Definition of Done? Simple, everyone involved in the project needs to know and understand what Done means. Furthermore, Done should be really done, as in, 'there is nothing stopping us from earning value with this function, except maybe the go-ahead from the Product Owner. Consider the alternative:
Project Manager: Is this function done?
Developer: Yes
Project Manager: So we can ship it?
Developer: Well, No. It needs to be tested, and I need to write some documentation, but the code works, really. I tested it... (pause) ...on my machine. What's wrong with this exchange? To the developer and to the project manager, "done" means something rather different. To the developer in this case, done means: "I don't have to work on this piece of code any more (unless the tester tells me something is wrong)." The project leader is looking for a statement that the code is ready to ship.

At its most basic level, a definition of Done creates a sh…

Scaling Scrum: SAFe, DAD, or LeSS?

Participants in last week's Scrum MasterClass wanted to evaluate approaches to scaling Scrum and Agile for their large enterprise. So I set out to review the available frameworks. Which one is best for your situation?

Recently a number of approaches have started gaining attention, including the Scaled Agile Framework ("SAFe") by Dean Leffingwell, Disciplined Agile Development (DAD), by Scott Ambler, and Large Scale Scrum (LeSS), by Craig Larman and Bas Vodde. (Follow the links for white papers or overviews of each approach).

How to compare these approaches? My starting point is Scrum in the team. Scrum has proven very effective at helping teams perform, even though it does not directly address the issues surrounding larger organizations and teams. An approach to scaling Scrum should not be inconsistent with Scrum itself.

Scrum implements a small number of principles and constraints: Inspect and Adapt. An interdisciplinary Team solves the problem. Deliver something of va…

Explaining Story Points to Management

During the February Scrum Breakfast in Zurich, the question arised, "How do I explain Story Points to Management?" A good question, and in all honesty, developers can be an even more critical audience than managers.

Traditional estimates attempt to answer the question, "how long will it take to develop X?" I could ask you a similar question, "How long does it take to get the nearest train station?

The answer, measured in time, depends on two things, the distance and the speed. Depending on whether I plan to go by car, by foot, by bicycle or (my personal favorite for short distances) trottinette, the answer can vary dramatically. So it is with software development. The productivity of a developer can vary dramatically, both as a function of innate ability and whether the task at hand plays to his strong points, so the time to produce a piece of software can vary dramatically. But the complexity of the problem doesn't depend on the person solving it, just …